I was curious about using the AI wireframe generator. if your page structure is well defined, and you know basically the template for which you want sections to be applied in a known method that works, but you want variance in the components that get used without a lot of customization overhead, is it better to clearly define all of that in the initial master prompt or what are the steps that you would take to approach getting your ideal design in in one shot? would it require additional prompting per section? I would like to avoid that if possible.
Richard P. is one-shot prompting a real thing? I thought that was a myth! Haha. Jokes aside....in what medium do you have this well-defined page structure? Just like a doc of some sort or? I know in today's world we're all just looking to go as fast as possible. Our main prompt window won't support super detailed or technical prompts to allow for one-shot prompting. And if I were being completely honest with you, I don't think Relume will ever get to that point. A process is still going to be required for a high-quality output. That process can look different for everybody, but its still important. With that said, if it were me, and we're talking about Relume v1 - I would probably put in a simple description of the website, its goals, a simple outline of the pages I wanted and generate it. It'll generate copy that at least feels close to what you'd have (if not worst case scenario) and it should generate the basic pages you'd expect. From there, you'll spend 2-3 hours massaging the layouts, elements, and refining the pages as a whole. Then I would move into copy. Style guide builder to lay down the foundations of the design system. Then export to Figma, to do the design mockups. Once approved, I would do the same export to Webflow and then apply my design styling that I did in the Figma step, manually. Let's say its a 10 page site. I'm probably in it for about what...6-8 hours at this point? Depends on a lot of factors obviously. You could also export to Claude Design if you wanted to get some quick design ideas - this works really well. But from my experience so far, I would just consider that step to be ideation and not expect to actually export anything Claude Design generated into say Claude Code then Webflow or what not. So maybe in a couple of business days, I have a fully functioning, high quality, maintainable website, ready to be pressure tested and polished for primetime. No, it didn't take me 30 minutes and a one-shot prompt...but if my goal was to build a website for a client that met their goals, generated revenue, and was a representation of my work at the highest level - I'd consider those few hours to be of high value and worth the effort! Just my two cents!
This may seem like a huge time suck, however It's faster than you think, but I would use Wisprflow to go in and tailor your wireframe according to your doc, you can add the all the necessary deets and get close to what you want from the start. But no doubt, it'll always take some massaging like Matt J. mentioned.
Precisely, the process is a little different and when you talk things out it's not only faster, but you get those creative juices flowing, it's all about the description and word choice of the person. The time saving on the copying and pasting and typing, even though it seems like the issue being addressed, is just the added bonus. Hope that helps!

