What's the general view on the need to go Relume>Figma>Webflow as opposed to Relume>Webflow?
Personally, I go straight from Relume to Webflow. If I need to, I'll do some quick tests in Figma but without necessarily using the Relume components. I find it faster. Clients are always surprised to receive a first draft that is almost already final and visually ready. I'm willing to take the risk of making visual adjustments directly in Webflow based on their feedback but 90% the process is much faster.
Its mostly about getting client approvals. However, at the agency I work at, we've been playing around with the idea of getting the wireframes approved by client (generated using Site Builder) and then we'll do the homepage design in Figma, and the rest will get designed directly in Webflow. It might be a happy medium of having some feedback loops/approvals and speed. Still experimenting though. 😉
I like the visual overview / bird's eye view I have in Figma of all pages, especially for larger sites. You can more easily spot indifferences imo & anticipate on that > at least in general I can make edits faster in Figma, since I worry a bit less about class names. Although I kinda like it, just overall experimenting feels a bit more time consuming to do strictly in WF. But do whatever feels right, you'll notice soon enough what works/doesn't work for you.
